“This is a contradiction. The prosecutor said his third testimony on June 23, 1998, highlighted the want for a refrigerator, motorcycle, and mixi. The third statement, recorded late, seems like an afterthought. The Court also dismissed his “very vague allegation” that the appellant beat the dead. Even assuming this accusation, the Court found no evidence of it quickly before the deceased's death. In addition to failing to show Section 304-B requirements, the Court found no cruelty. Given this, the Court ruled: IPC Section 304-B was enacted in 1986. This Court has frequently articulated Section 304-B's offense ingredients. Trial Courts keep making the same mistakes. State Judicial Academies must act. This may be moral conviction.” While allowing the appeal, the Court overturned the judgments.